I think I've stated on several occasions that I'm not the biggest fan of Peter Lawford, as his performances are generally fairly wooden. However, I had another of his films on my DVR, Rogue's March, so I watched it to put up another post here.
The movie is set in the late Victorian era, when Britain has control over India although the Russians would like to have access to a warm-water port. To that end the Russians have been supporting the Afghans who are on the border of the British possessions just across the Khyber Pass. Lawford plays Dion Lenbridge, a captain in the Royal Midland Fusiliers, who has a family tradition of serving in the regiment as his father Henry (Leo G. Carroll) is a colonel in the regiment. Dion also has a girlfriend Jane (Janice Rule) he's planning to marry.
Except that the Russians bugger things up. The Russian embassy in London has one of Dion's underlings as a spy, and that underling has absconded with some documents that the Russians are supposed to copy before returning them to where they're kept under lock and key and for which Dion is responsible. This being the days before tiny cameras that could take photographs of the documents, they have to be taken for a substantial amount of time to be copied. Unfortunately, the Russians don't have enough time as the Fusiliers are called to service on the restive frontier between British India and Afghanistan.
That call-up screws up Dion's plans for marriage, but far worse is that the missing documents get Dion arrested and court-martialled for the missing documents. Not helping is the fact that the Russians kill the real culprit, leaving Dion with no defense. He's tried and convicted, but for whatever reason not sentenced to death. Now, of course, since this all happens within the first 15 minutes or so, we know this isn't going to be the end of the movie. Indeed, Dion escapes from prison somehow (not enough detail is paid to the how here). He also has the brilliant idea of reenlisting in the army, albeit it in a different regiment under a different identity and starting off as a private. He figures this is the last place the authorities will ever look for him, and besides, the regiment he joins up with is likely to be sent to Singapore, far away from where his old regiment is and even farther away from Britain.
But, woudln't you know it, things heat up in India, and while Dion's new regiment is on its way to Singapore, they get orders that they actually have to go to India. Dion is for understandable reasons worried that he's going to be found out, but there's not much he can do. At least, not until the Afghans actually attack and Dion sees his chance to serve with distinction. Worse, this Afghan attack is engineered by one of the Russians who was at the embassy in London and responsible for ordering the taking of those documents for which Dion was court-martialled in the first place. That Russians' confession allows us to have the requisite happy ending.
Rogue's March is very much a programmer, and definitely not nearly as good as it could have been. This is a movie that cries out for color cinematography, but we get flat black and white, allegedly filmed partly at the real Khyber Pass. It also doesn't help that we have Peter Lawford again, who doesn't exactly impress, in a by-the-numbers story that has an implausible set-up and ending. There's a reason I hadn't hear of Rogue's March before, and a reason why it's not very memorable.
.png)

